Medicaid → Implementation → Retention & Support
Retention & Support
Retaining Medicaid members who have elected to participate in the National Diabetes Prevention Program (National DPP) lifestyle change program is an important program objective. In general, the longer individuals stay in the program, the better their outcomes. Retention also impacts the ability of a CDC-recognized organization to maintain CDC recognition and receive performance-based payments.
This page contains the following topics:
- Retention Improves Outcomes, and Addressing HRSN Impacts Retention
- Retention Best Practices
- Retention Strategies in Practice
- Tailoring Retention Practices in Rural Areas
- Using Incentives and Program Supports
- Incentives and Program Supports in Practice
- Retention Statistics
Information about understanding and adapting to an individual’s readiness to participate in the program is available on the Recruitment and Referrals page of the Coverage Toolkit.
Retention Improves Outcomes
Research from CDC’s Diabetes Prevention Recognition Program (DPRP) 2017 dataset has shown the longer a person stays in the program, the better their outcomes. For example, CDC has found that there is a significant association between staying in the program past the first 16 weekly sessions and achieving the 5%+ weight loss. Participants that remain in the program for 17+ sessions (the second six months of the program) achieve weight loss at higher rates than those in the program for the first 16 sessions (the first six months of the program).
Additional retention and outcomes statistics from CDC analyses on the DPRP 2017 dataset are indicated below.
- >
- Analyses on three weight loss distributions (low, medium, and high weight loss) found that individuals in all three groups, regardless of amount of weight loss, exhibited the same trend: those attending 17+ sessions and having an average of 150+ minutes of physical activity per week had increasingly higher percent weight loss among all race/ethnicity groups.
- For women with gestational diabetes mellitus, significant predictors of achieving 5% weight loss were meeting the 150 minutes of physical activity, attending ≥ 17 sessions, staying in the program for more than 183 days, and age 45–64 years.
- For every additional session attended and every 30 minutes of activity reported, participants lost 0.3% of body weight (p < 0.0001). See the ADA report here.
Medicaid Eligibility and Churn
Individuals move in and out of Medicaid eligibility frequently due to changing financial status or other reasons, often administrative in nature, that disqualify them for continuing coverage. This movement in and out of Medicaid coverage is often referred to as churn and can be a challenge for a year-long program like the National DPP lifestyle change program. Medicaid churn rates vary substantially by state and are dependent on the qualifying level of income for Medicaid eligibility. Beyond churn, there are many possible status changes that can occur for an individual that may impact their ability to participate in the program, including switching between Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs) or health plans. For more information on churn and potential strategies states can consider to mitigate its effects, see the Reimbursement page of the Coverage Toolkit.
Addressing Health-Related Social Needs (HRSN) Impacts Retention
Efforts to improve retention in the National DPP lifestyle change program often require broader approaches that address social, economic, and environmental factors that impact health outcomes. Social drivers of health are conditions in the environments in which people are born, live, learn, work, play, pray, and age that affect a wide range of health, functioning, and quality of life outcomes. While everyone experiences social drivers of health, some populations and individuals at greatest risk for type 2 diabetes and its complications may have HRSN stemming from these drivers. While social drivers of health are broader social conditions, HRSN are more immediate individual, or family needs impacted by those conditions. They include housing insecurity, food insecurity, or lack of reliable transportation that can lead to decreased health and a lower quality of life.
HRSN may serve as a barrier to both access and continued participation in the National DPP lifestyle change program. An increasing number of CDC-recognized organizations are structuring their programs so that some of these barriers to participation can be overcome, such as allowing for the provision of childcare vouchers and access to healthy food. For examples of how a CDC-recognized organization can contract with an MCO to address HRSN, see the MCO Contracting page of the Coverage Toolkit.
The National DPP Lifestyle Change Program Curriculum Focuses on Valuable Skills that Address HRSN and Support Retention
The curriculum of the National DPP lifestyle change program gives participants the opportunity to focus on skills including decision making, problem solving, stress management, and priority setting that can help participants overcome HRSN and support their retention in the program. The program curriculum respects participants’ autonomy to make health behavior changes with support from Lifestyle Coaches. The relationships between a participant and their Lifestyle Coach can increase self-efficacy among participants. Likewise, the relationships between participants are beneficial and can provide long-term social support and camaraderie as participants seek to make health behavior changes.
In addition to these benefits, the National DPP lifestyle change program may provide a year-long forum to discuss the complexities of health care, health care providers, and health insurance, ideally leaving participants with a clearer understanding of how to function within the health care system. Due to its multiple touch points over the course of one year, the program can also be used as a referral point to encourage participants to access other community resources or health, behavioral, and social care services.
Examples of Addressing HRSN to Support Retention Through the National DPP Lifestyle Change Program
This section will outline examples from states and organizations that are addressing HRSN in various ways that impact engagement with the National DPP lifestyle change program.
AAPCHO
The Association of Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations (AAPCHO) serves Pacific Islanders by collaborating with local communities, federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), and other organizations to improve the health of Pacific Islanders. Through the Pacific Islander Diabetes Prevention Program (PI-DPP), AAPCHO provided a CDC-recognized diabetes prevention program that was tailored to Pacific Islanders. Within that program, AAPCHO provided participants with assistance and program supports to address HRSN uniquely faced by this population.
On July 21, 2021, AAPCHO, in collaboration with other partners, held a webinar to explore strategies for HRSN screening and building effective practices to address participants’ needs and support their retention in the program.
Alaska
Alaska offers the National DPP lifestyle change program to all eligible Alaskans free of cost. The program is offered online through Omada.
Illinois
Illinois is advancing Medicaid participant enrollment in the National DPP lifestyle change program by better understanding the challenges beneficiaries have related to participation and retention. Current initiatives include holding listening sessions to better understand what factors would encourage participants to stay in the program and what skills they would like to develop. The Illinois Department of Public Health is also utilizing grant funding to build a community advisory group, which involves selecting National DPP lifestyle change program graduates to serve as community advisors and develop strategies to improve access to the program.
To learn more about Medicaid coverage of the National DPP lifestyle change program in Illinois, see Illinois’ State Story of Medicaid Coverage.
Maryland
To better address HRSN, Maryland Department of Health has connected each of their managed care organizations (MCOs) with regional CDC-recognized organizations to discuss and develop plans for collaboration. Together they have developed an eligibility algorithm and are creating pathways to work with health care providers to adapt initiatives to better align with a patient-centered point of view. This includes developing referrals to community-based organizations that address HRSN.
In addition to their referral system, Maryland is also using CHWs as Lifestyle Coaches to deliver the National DPP lifestyle change program. CHWs typically act as a member of the care delivery team supporting patients by providing care education, social service navigation, and coordination, while also organizing peer support and performing outreach. In Maryland, CHWs are certified by accredited training programs.
For additional information about Maryland’s involvement with the National DPP lifestyle change program, see the Maryland Medicaid Demonstration Project page of the Coverage Toolkit.
Mississippi
The Mississippi State Department of Health has collaborated with their Department of Agriculture to expand the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) program benefits and deliver additional food to people participating in the National DPP lifestyle change program and other evidence-based programs such as Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES). As part of this initiative, Mississippi has worked with farmers’ markets to support locations near community centers and prepare community food subscription programs for individuals in need.
North Carolina
The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (NCDHHS) launched its Healthy Opportunities Pilots program in February 2022 through an 1115 waiver. These pilots covered the cost of 29 interventions, including the National DPP lifestyle change program, for three counties enrolled in the regional pilots. These pilots also addressed other HRSN such as housing stability, transportation, food security, interpersonal violence, and toxic stress. The goal of the pilots was to create and evaluate a systematic approach to integrate and finance evidence-based, non-medical interventions.
The Healthy Opportunities Pilots 1115 waiver was renewed in 2024. Under the existing 1115 waiver, the entire state will have coverage for the National DPP lifestyle change program. Additionally, the state has the authority to provide HRSN nutrition supports, including counseling and instruction, home delivered meals, medically tailored meals, pantry stocking, and nutrition prescriptions.
To read more about the outcomes of these pilots, please go here.
Rhode Island
The Rhode Island Department of Health is implementing multiple layers of screening for and addressing HRSN among National DPP lifestyle change program participants. In partnership with the state’s Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) and CDC-recognized organizations, it is focusing on addressing HRSN-related factors that impact program participation, as well as needs that go beyond program goals. The Rhode Island Department of Health’s planning team outlined a screening and referral workflow to identify HRSN touch points. For example, Community Health Network (CHN) patient navigators serve a key role in identifying HRSN during both enrollment and follow-up calls. Rhode Island plans to scale National DPP lifestyle change program access and utilization by increasing the number of CHWs and Lifestyle Coaches that are trained in these areas.
Virginia
The Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services (Virginia Medicaid) has engaged in discussions with MCOs on how individuals with HRSN can be identified. Virginia Medicaid is also working to identify individuals that are eligible for the National DPP lifestyle change program by linking primary care physicians to National DPP lifestyle change program referrals via automated orders through their electronic health record (EHR). This process allows collaborative partners to access HRSN screenings performed directly by those who care for the individuals.
Within the recruitment process, Virginia Medicaid is also creating initiatives to ask and determine what would prevent participants from participating in the National DPP lifestyle change program. This initiative allows Virginia Medicaid to assess individual HRSN. This initiative is supported by participating MCOs that want to improve enrollment and retention in the National DPP lifestyle change program.
In Virginia’s model, CHWs directly market the National DPP lifestyle change program to target populations through planned community activities, health fairs, local churches, and social media campaigns. CHWs utilize the 3-2-1 method for participant outreach – 3 phone calls, 2 texts, and 1 email. CHWs also utilize the PRAPARE tool to identify potential health-related social needs prior to the first session.
In addition to this work, Virginia is working to roll out an initiative that provides healthy food vouchers and childcare stipends to participants in the National DPP lifestyle program as they meet predetermined milestones.
Retention Best Practices
Best Practices Guide
NACDD, Leavitt Partners, and the Minnesota Department of Health partnered to compile evidence- and experience-based best practices on recruitment, enrollment, and retention into a single Best Practices Guide. The guide is written for Lifestyle Coaches and program coordinators who serve low income, Medicaid-eligible participants. However, many of the principles discussed in the guide could be used by any partner working to increase recruitment, enrollment, and retention in the National DPP lifestyle change program and would apply to all eligible participants.
The Best Practices Guide contains the following nine retention related best practices. For each best practice, the guide includes the rationale behind the practice, tips for action, linked resources, and implementation examples from Lifestyle Coaches and program coordinators. In conjunction with the guide, the Minnesota Department of Health released a series of videos interviewing Lifestyle Coaches and program coordinators to emphasize the retention strategies detailed in the Best Practices Guide. The videos are linked in the best practices below.
-
1. Meet Unique Participant Needs
Enhance the National DPP lifestyle change program to meet the needs of specific participants. Enhancements may be tailored around the participants’ community, age, literacy level, disabilities, income level, and location (e.g., rural vs. urban). Pages 27-29 of the Best Practices Guide provide a list of publications describing considerations and enhancements for various populations.
2. Use Low-Literacy Materials
Incorporate the use of additional low-literacy materials, such as visuals and materials written at a 6th grade level or below, to address educational barriers.
3. Address Barriers to Participation
Find creative solutions to address the common barriers that prevent participants from enrolling and/or continuing in the program, including HRSN barriers, such as addressing childcare or transportation concerns, and making it easier for participants to catch up on missed sessions.
4. Expand Flexibility through Online and Distance Learning
Increase access to the National DPP lifestyle change program by offering a combination of in-person, online, and/or distance learning delivery of the program.
5. Encourage Social Connections
Facilitate social connections between program participants during and outside of sessions such as through setting up a private social media group for the participants and organizing physical activities.
6. Offer Supplementary Experiences
Add variety and interest by offering unique supplementary experiences to participants, such as a grocery store tour, cooking demonstrations, or guest speakers. Address food insecurity by partnering with a local food shelter to provide healthy foods at each session.
7. Tailor Communications to Participants
Contact program participants frequently to encourage continued participation, and tailor the mode of communication to the preferences of the participants.
8. Use Incentives and Program Supports
Provide incentives and program supports related to healthy living. Additional information that is complementary to what is found in the Best Practices Guide can be found in the Using Incentives and Program Supports section below.
9. Provide Lifestyle Coach Training
Improve the participants’ experience by developing a team of highly skilled Lifestyle Coaches through continuing education.
Medicaid Coverage for the National DPP Demonstration Project Retention Brief
NACDD, with funding from the Division of Diabetes Translation at CDC, led the Medicaid Coverage for the National DPP Demonstration Project with Maryland and Oregon to show how state Medicaid agencies and state health departments can collaborate to implement, deliver, and sustain coverage of the National DPP lifestyle change program.
The strategies implemented by MCOs, accountable care organizations (ACOs), and CDC-recognized organizations to increase participant retention during the Demonstration are summarized in the Medicaid Coverage for the National DPP Demonstration Project Retention Brief. The Demonstration Project concluded that the main reasons participants discontinued the program was due to time constraints, technology issues, family commitments, classes being held at inconvenient times, lack of reliable transportation, lack of reliable internet, and a perception of inability to achieve goals. These barriers may serve as focal points to improve National DPP lifestyle change program retention. The Demonstration Project also found that retention was improved when participants were referred by a health care provider, received program support tools, such as pedometers, scales, or athletic gear or clothing, and reported excellent or good health.
CDC Retention Resources
Retention Tip Sheet
CDC has developed a tip sheet that provides insights and lessons learned about improving participant retention, including how to establish participant buy-in, retention strategies for months 7-12, and how to build the capacity of Lifestyle Coaches to increase retention.
Personal Success Tool
CDC created the Personal Success Tool (PST) to help increase participant retention. It has interactive, web-based modules to encourage participants, reinforce information they have learned in class, and provide tailored support to meet their needs. The PST is based on behavior change theory and audience research, and has been tested by coaches and participants in nine National DPP lifestyle change programs. It includes motivational messages, testimonials, short games, quizzes, and participant pledges.
Who uses the PST?
The PST is designed for Lifestyle Coaches and National DPP lifestyle change program participants. Coaches use the PST to help participants stay engaged by sending related modules after each class. Participants can review the modules on a computer, smartphone, or tablet, and each activity only takes a few minutes to complete.
The PST is designed to follow the order of the PreventT2 curriculum, but can be used with any CDC-recognized National DPP lifestyle change program curriculum.
Lifestyle Coach Perspectives on the PST
- “Using the Personal Success Tool will help you stay motivated when you need extra encouragement.”
- “Completing the modules will reinforce what you learn in class, helping you master new ideas, and continue to be successful in the long term.”
- “…the PST is easy to use and only takes a few minutes to review during class.”
PST Resources for Lifestyle Coaches (Additional marketing resources, including Spanish language versions, are available on CDC’s PST page on the National DPP Customer Service Center)
- Lifestyle Coach’s Guide—an overview of the PST, including when and how to use it
- Quick Reference Guide—a printable worksheet to schedule when to send each module to program participants
- PST Talking Points—ideas on how to introduce the PST to program participants
- PST Participant Overview—a handout for program participants about the PST
Retention Strategies in Practice
The tabs below describe how various states and organizations have put retention strategies into practice.
Maryland
Maryland participated in the Medicaid Coverage for the National DPP Demonstration Project funded by CDC and managed by NACDD. A brief on the retention strategies implemented during that project can be found here.
A survey conducted with the participating Medicaid MCOs revealed some lessons learned regarding retention, including:
- Recruitment and retention success depended heavily on the participating MCOs’ traditional communication vehicle with its members. For example, while text messages worked well with one MCO that frequently communicated via text, texts from another MCO that did not traditionally communicate via text resulted in many confused members and lacked success.
- Class reminders from the MCO or CDC-recognized organization via phone and/or email both prior to the first class and before every class were helpful in recruiting and retaining participants.
To learn more about how the Medicaid Coverage for the National DPP Demonstration Project was implemented in Maryland and Maryland’s plan for ongoing sustainability of the program, visit the Maryland Medicaid Demonstration Project page of the Coverage Toolkit.
Minnesota
In 2016, the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Department of Human Services cited the following as critical success factors and/or best practices for engaging and retaining Medicaid members in the National DPP lifestyle change program. These factors are based on learnings from program implementation, key informational interviews, and participant focus groups:
- Providing services for participants, including transportation and childcare to eliminate barriers to participation
- Providing a healthy snack during the session
- Initiating reminder calls or letters and providing ongoing support to participants
- Building in extra time to support participants through sometimes challenging personal/familial circumstances
- Facilitating participant access to other support programs (e.g., food assistance, health insurance, housing support)
- Training community health workers and/or local community clinic staff to serve as Lifestyle Coaches (and ensuring that they can bill the hours necessary to deliver the program)
- Showing sensitivity to participants with low literacy (e.g., using photos instead of written text, using hands-on activities rather than reading from a script, etc.)
- Coordinating with the participants’ local primary care clinics
- Identifying, with the help of the clinics, a familiar and accessible meeting location for participants (e.g., not necessarily the YMCA, even if the Lifestyle Coach is from the YMCA)
- Hiring coaches from cultural backgrounds that match the cultural backgrounds of the participants (community health workers are a good option to fill this cultural need)
- Providing instruction in participants’ primary language (e.g., Somali, Hmong, Spanish)
- Translating some program materials (such as a food tracker) into the participants’ primary languages
To learn more about how the National DPP lifestyle change program has been implemented in Minnesota, see the Minnesota State Story of Medicaid Coverage page of the Coverage Toolkit.
Montana: Individuals with Disabilities
In 2012, Montana Medicaid started offering the National DPP lifestyle change program as a covered benefit to Medicaid enrollees with and without disabilities. Over the first two years, roughly one-third of program participants had a disability. Evaluations on the state’s program have indicated that, although individuals with disabilities tended to start with a higher BMI baseline and were less likely to achieve 5–7% weight loss, they could still successfully participate in the National DPP lifestyle change program. Some program adaptations may be necessary, however, to address their needs and to increase success.
A survey that gathered feedback from Lifestyle Coaches on the program revealed that some curriculum content was too complex for a subset of beneficiaries and that some participants found food journaling to be challenging. It further indicated that transportation is an obstacle to participation. Based on this and other survey feedback, the following recommendations were made:
- Engage family, case managers, and Medicaid transportation assistance services to help program participants with transportation
- Simplify curriculum content as needed
- Simplify self-monitoring tools as needed
- Provide individual support as needed
A program manager from the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services also shared the following as valuable practices for implementing the program within the Medicaid population and for individuals with disabilities:
- Train Lifestyle Coaches on different types of disabilities (both physical and cognitive) and how those disabilities could impact how someone might learn, meet goals, and track eating. The Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services engaged the National Center on Health, Physical Activity and Disability (NCHPAD) to provide this training to Lifestyle Coaches.
- Train Lifestyle Coaches about issues and solutions relating to accessing health care and fitness centers (e.g., simple things someone could do to rearrange exercise equipment so that it could be more accessible to someone in a wheelchair).
- Enable Lifestyle Coaches to practice coaching and secure feedback from individuals that are knowledgeable about disabilities. For example, volunteers from the Montana Disability and Health Program at the University of Montana and Centers for Independent Living role-played as National DPP lifestyle change program participants, so that the coaches could practice supporting individuals with disabilities.
- Ensure that Lifestyle Coaches share budget-friendly food planning and physical activity information (e.g., talking about exercises that are free, or highlighting that frozen fruits and vegetables may be cheaper than fresh produce).
To learn more about how the National DPP lifestyle change program has been implemented in Montana, see the Montana State Story of Medicaid Coverage page of the Coverage Toolkit.
Oregon
Health Share of Oregon was one of the Coordinated Care Organizations that participated in the Medicaid Coverage for the National DPP Demonstration Project funded by CDC and managed by NACDD. A brief on the retention strategies implemented during that project can be found here. Some of the best practices and lessons that Health Share of Oregon learned from its experience were the following:
Lessons Learned:
- It is more difficult to motivate participants to continue to attend sessions when there are long gaps between them (i.e., monthly classes can be challenging to retain attendance)
- Incentives can be unsustainable if funded with grant money
- It is important to find the communication style that works best for the participants, whether it is text, phone call, or email
Best Practices:
- Barriers, such as childcare or transportation, should be addressed upfront
- Partnering with an early learning hub is one way to address childcare
- An accessible location, especially by public transit, is important
- Allowing family members or caretakers to also participate in the program promotes retention
- Resources should be modified for language and cultural relevance
- A mini evaluation at the end of each class ensures that methods and/or items promote success
- Communication can be used to keep participants engaged during the off-weeks
- Bringing in outside resources with additional information and tools can keep participants engaged
- Incentives, raffles, or challenges can provide additional motivation to participants
To learn more about how the Medicaid Coverage for the National DPP Demonstration Project was implemented in Oregon and Oregon’s plan for ongoing sustainability of the program, visit the Oregon Medicaid Demonstration Project page of the Coverage Toolkit.
YMCA
A senior director of evidence-based health interventions at the YMCA of the USA indicated that the following factors contributed to retaining participants:
- Ensuring that Lifestyle Coaches had strong facilitation skills, empathy, and can support an effective group dynamic
- Educating participants about the requirements of the program prior to the first session (including the program’s duration and the likely challenges of achieving behavior change)
Tailoring Retention Practices in Rural Areas
Various studies on diabetes education and prevention programs in rural areas have indicated the following factors as contributing to successful implementation:
- Providing participant transportation to classes when needed
- Hosting the program in a common, well-known location
- Developing positive relationships with and engaging providers, social workers, and other community partners
- Considering cultural sensitivities and differences between counties when recruiting and engaging participants
- Establishing support from community leaders
- Educating communities on the underlying SDOH factors
- Helping communities better understand their capacity, assets, and resources
- Gaining an understanding of local politics
- Offering the program via telehealth to increase access
The studies summarized above are found here: Appalachia, Montana, Montana telehealth, Federal Office of Rural Health Policy (FORHP).
In addition, NACDD collected the following information from state and local health department representatives from Montana, Colorado, North Dakota, and Ohio regarding challenges facing rural populations and opportunities to mitigate those challenges.
Access
Challenge
- Lack of Lifestyle Coaches or CDC- recognized organizations
- Limited broadband internet access in some rural areas
Opportunity
- Online delivery options, where internet is available
- Program delivery in-person and via telehealth technology to remote sites (for an example of how telehealth delivery can be implemented, see the Montana State Story of Medicaid Coverage page of the Coverage Toolkit)
- Encouraging the following to deliver the program: Cooperative Extension System through land grant universities; places where people already gather such as community and senior centers, churches, and libraries; and hospital systems that have identified obesity as a priority through community health assessments
Travel Time
Challenge
- Travel distances—both for coaches and participants—can be further in rural areas
Opportunity
- Encouraging carpooling, which also enhances opportunities for support
- Use “buy one, get one free” registration deals to engage spouses or friends
- Providing gas cards as incentives
- Have several Lifestyle Coaches trained in each organization to share the travel burden
Participants Moving
Challenge
- Participants may move to a different location throughout the year
Opportunity
- Allow participants to join a class at other locations so they can complete the yearlong program
Participation

- A less populous area can make it difficult to enroll enough participants
- Word of mouth is very powerful in rural areas
- Use “buy one, get one free” registration deals to engage spouses or friends
- Delivery organizations developing a collaborative service delivery model to increase class options for participants and increase enrollment for all sites
Marketing
Challenge
- Finding a marketing strategy for the rural population
Opportunity
- Local radio
- Local free newspapers available in grocery stores
- Use digital strategies. See the CDC’s resource on Strategies that Work: Using Digital Strategies to Reach Rural Populations here*.
- Use word-of-mouth marketing. See the CDC’s resource on Strategies that Work: Using Word-of-Mouth Marketing to Reach Rural Populations here*.
Lifestyle Coach Support
Challenge
- Since Lifestyle Coaches may be spread out, it may be difficult to support them
Opportunity
- Monthly support calls and annual face-to-face meetings to offer refresher training, support, resources, and best practices
Recruitment and Referrals
Challenge
- Because of the diffused population, it may be difficult to identify potential participants
Opportunity
- Support from rural health/hospital systems is critical as it may be the only medical care in the area
- Screening and testing through employers is also key
- Having a neutral party organize referrals (e.g., the Cooperative Extension) allows providers to have one number for referrals to programs
- Gaining buy-in from local health care providers and hospitals
Using Incentives and Program Supports
Some CDC-recognized organizations and their partners use incentives and program supports to enhance participant enrollment and retention. In this context, program supports are items, services, and activities that:
- Reinforce information in the curriculum. Examples include measuring cups and cooking demonstrations.
- Remove barriers to participation. Examples include transportation vouchers, weight scales, mobile devices, and prepaid phone minutes or data.
- Address social drivers of health. Examples include access to healthy foods and referrals to community social support resources.
- Promote social support and connectedness. Examples include one-on-one meetings with the Lifestyle Coach and social media groups.
In general, programs have shown to have higher attendance rates when they include incentives or program supports.

Source: MIPCD Final Evaluation Report – Figure E-2
There are many characteristics of a good incentive program that are important to consider. It will be important to determine:
- Who will receive the incentive
- What type of incentive will be given (e.g., cash, food vouchers, food scales, etc.); Note: public funds cannot be used for cash incentives for the National DPP lifestyle change program.
- What target or goals will need to be achieved to receive the incentive
- When participants will receive the incentive (e.g., immediately following achievement of the target or goal, on a fixed schedule, etc.)
- What the value of the incentive will be
- Whether the incentive is guaranteed (e.g., when using a lottery method, the incentive is not guaranteed)
- Whether the incentive is aligned with program goals and provides additional support for individuals to achieve the desired outcomes

The sessions during the last six months of the program emphasize maintaining a healthy lifestyle that was learned in the first six months of classes. Participation in these classes provide continued support and motivation for individuals seeking to retain a healthy lifestyle. When developing incentives, steps should be taken to develop a model that encourages participants to maintain participation throughout the second six months of the program, in addition to the first six months.
For an example of how to select the characteristics of a good incentive program, see the MIPCD Grant States example below.
The CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation has released resources on using incentives and program supports with National DPP lifestyle change program participants. These include:
- Using Program Supports to Enhance the National DPP Webinar: CDC highlights the key efforts to scale the National DPP in areas at higher risk for type 2 diabetes, discusses the partners in that effort, and shares approaches from organizations that used various types of program supports to help reinforce information in the program curriculum, remove barriers to participation, address social drivers of health, and promote social support.
- Emerging Practices - Guide for Using Incentives to Enroll and Retain Participants: This guide provides information about incentives for organizations that are interested in using them. It describes different types of incentives and the level of evidence to support them. It also provides information about factors to consider when deciding whether to use incentives.
- Keys to Success - Using Program Supports for Retention: This tip sheet provides lessons learned and insights from organizations that used program supports to retain participants in their lifestyle change programs.
- Incentives Can Improve Diabetes Health Measures: This infographic Illustrates the high-level findings from the study, providing examples of effective types of incentives for program participants and outlining how organizations can best design program incentives for improved health results.
Note: When covering the National DPP in Medicaid, consideration will need to be given to the type of incentives and program supports that can be offered. Generally, federal Medicaid matching funds cannot be used to pay for program incentives (unless the state has received approval through an 1115 or other waiver). As such, state or grant funds may be needed to pay for program supports or incentives. Medicaid MCOs could also pay for program incentives out of their administrative funds.
Additionally, organizations receiving funding from CDC or through a CDC cooperative agreement should consult the program guidance before planning to use incentives. The use of CDC funds to purchase certain items may be restricted or have certain guidelines that organizations should adhere to.
Many state Medicaid programs and MCOs operate beneficiary incentive programs to support healthy behaviors. The supports used in these programs range from reductions in cost sharing (a discount that lowers that amount paid for deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance), to the ability to choose products from catalogues, to gift cards or vouchers for specific vendors (i.e., not redeemable for cash), and more.
It is important to note, however, that there are state and federal regulations regarding how Medicaid beneficiary incentives and program supports can be designed, delivered, and marketed. Rules may also vary on a state-by-state basis and differ depending on what entity (the state, an MCO, Medicaid provider, or other third party) is providing the program supports.
Given the complexity of these regulations, public health and CDC-recognized organizations should coordinate with their state’s Medicaid agency when developing a program support system for Medicaid beneficiaries participating in the National DPP lifestyle change program and beyond. Four benefits to coordinating with the state Medicaid agency are listed below.
First, it is good practice to involve Medicaid program administrators in any initiative that will impact Medicaid beneficiaries. Program administrators can provide valuable feedback on potential impacts the program supports may have on the Medicaid population, help with implementation efforts, provide guidance on any potential federal matching dollars, and facilitate coordination and outreach with Medicaid beneficiaries.
Second, many Medicaid programs and MCOs have existing program supports in place. Adding another support may create confusion around the existing programs. Coordination with the Medicaid agency can help ensure that any new program support will align with existing or planned initiatives.
Third, financial eligibility for Medicaid differs by program and population type. Depending on how program supports are structured, they could impact the income calculations and reporting requirements for some beneficiaries in Medicaid and other needs-based programs (i.e., be interpreted as reportable income). While it is unlikely that program supports used for the National DPP lifestyle change program would make an individual ineligible for coverage, it is advisable to work with the state Medicaid agency to ensure the program supports are within any designated limits and will not jeopardize beneficiary eligibility.
Finally, MCOs have specific regulatory and contractual constraints on how to design and notify enrollees of program supports. For example, gift cards and vouchers are subject to applicable state and federal laws and regulations related to Medicaid managed care marketing activities and Social Security Act § 1128A, among others. MCOs and/or the Medicaid agency can provide guidance on these issues.
Food-Based Nutrition Supports
A key component of the National DPP lifestyle change program curriculum revolves around improving nutrition and strengthening healthy eating habits. However, according to 2023 data published by the USDA, 13.5 percent, or 18 million U.S. households are food insecure, meaning that at times during the year, these households were uncertain of having or unable to acquire enough food to meet the needs of all members because they had insufficient money or other resources for food. Implementing food-based nutrition supports and removing barriers to food security could improve retention in the National DPP lifestyle change program and improve diabetes risk reduction, chronic disease prevention, and program outcomes.
State Medicaid agencies, public health, managed care organizations (MCOs), and CDC-recognized organizations are aware of initiatives across the state and in specific communities that address HRSN such as food insecurity and could consider initiating partnerships that increase participants’ access to these services. For example, many states and communities have programs related to healthy food procurement. Strategies to improve access to healthy food among people with higher risk for chronic disease include efforts such as implementing healthy food prescription programs at farmers’ markets; stocking healthy foods at certain grocery stores, gas stations, and corner stores; and issuing permits for mobile produce vendors. These types of initiatives may offer opportunities for CDC-recognized organizations to support Medicaid beneficiaries in accessing healthy foods to support the lifestyle changes they are learning about in the program.
CDC-recognized organizations can consider incorporating food insecurity assessments as part of their existing HRSN screening processes and implement food and nutrition supports to improve retention and outcomes in the program. In addition to in-house supports such as cooking or knife skills demos, CDC recognized organizations can also serve as a key linkage point to external food assistance programs, such as those adult-focused programs summarized by Feeding America:
- Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): Provides timely, targeted, and temporary benefits to low-income Americans to buy groceries.
- The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP): Provides USDA commodities to families in need of short-term hunger relief through emergency food providers like food banks.
- The Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP): Provides food assistance for low-income seniors with a monthly package of healthy USDA commodities.
- Women, Infants, and Children (WIC): Provides nutritious foods and nutrition education for low-income, at risk women and infants.
Recent research has placed population-level food insecurity programs such as SNAP and WIC on the same spectrum as other, more focused nutrition-based interventions that are incorporated into clinical care, such as medically tailored meal deliveries. This spectrum of programs are being referred to as food is medicine interventions. For more information on this spectrum of programs, see the Food is Medicine page of the Coverage Toolkit or the Food is Medicine – Leveraging FIM to Support the National DPP Lifestyle Change Program Fact Sheet.
Incentives and Program Supports in Practice
The examples below describe how various organizations have approached offering incentives and program supports in their National DPP lifestyle change programs.
CDC: Lifestyle Modification Programs
In 2022, CDC published a research study about the use of incentives in lifestyle modification programs (like the National DPP lifestyle change program and diabetes self-management education and support services) and how they can benefit participants. The manuscript details how individuals in lifestyle modification programs who received an incentive improved their body weight, body mass index, and blood pressure more than participants who did not receive an incentive.
Maryland
One Maryland MCO that participated in the Medicaid Coverage for the National DPP Demonstration Project provided various program supports according to the schedule below.
To learn more about how the Medicaid Coverage for the National DPP Demonstration Project was implemented in Maryland and Maryland’s plan for ongoing sustainability of the program, visit the Maryland Medicaid Demonstration Project page of the Coverage Toolkit.
MIPCD Grant States
Ten states received Medicaid Incentives for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (MIPCD) grants. Four of the ten states—Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, and New York—used a subset of the grant dollars to fund incentives specifically for the National DPP lifestyle change program. A summary of key findings from the evaluations is provided below.
The study found that participants receiving incentives had significantly higher attendance (attended 1‒2 more National DPP lifestyle change classes) than control groups without incentives. However, beneficiaries indicated that while incentives served as a hook to get them enrolled, they were not the driver behind continued participation. Reaching goals, starting to feel better, and establishing a relationship with a coach who cares about them and acknowledges their successes were what kept them engaged.
The study also found that the type of incentive used is very important and that consideration must be given to its value and appropriateness. For example, while incentives increased attendance, they did not necessarily increase usage of other services evaluated through the grant, such as meetings with a health coach or doctor or gym visits. In the preliminary evaluation, several programs indicated that they had provided program participants with gym memberships, but later found that the participants weren’t using them because some people did not know how to use a gym, were overweight and uncomfortable wearing exercise clothes in the gym, or were from a culture that did not approve of co-ed gyms.
The timing and delivery of incentives are also crucial. Incentives should be given as soon as a person meets their goal—the clearer the relationship is between the incentive and the goal, the better the results. In states where this relationship was delayed—where a person had to wait until the next time they came into the class to receive the incentive or wait until it arrived in the mail—it resulted in people being frustrated or not realizing that the incentive was tied to reaching a goal.
The study of the incentive design proved inconclusive. When states tested different approaches to offering incentives—such as tying the incentive to activities, outcomes, or both—there was no clear pattern to suggest that one incentive design was more successful than another in improving health or reducing claims-based expenditures and utilization.
The MIPCD final evaluation report can be accessed here.
Montana
Montana conducted a study testing the effectiveness of using financial incentives for participation in its Medicaid National DPP lifestyle change program. Participants in the incentive cohort were given incremental financial incentives, up to a maximum of $320, for attendance, behavior change, and weight loss goal achievement. The median incentive amount earned was $110 per participant during the 3-year study.
While the study found that the incentive cohort attended significantly more sessions, reported greater physical activity, and self-monitored fat more frequently compared to the non-incentive cohort, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts in attaining greater than 5% or 7% weight loss.
To learn more about how the National DPP lifestyle change program has been implemented in Montana, see the Montana State Story of Medicaid Coverage page of the Coverage Toolkit.
North Carolina: Minority Diabetes Prevention Program
North Carolina received state funds through their Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities to establish North Carolina’s Minority Diabetes Prevention Program, which focuses on increasing minority access to and participation in National DPP lifestyle change programs. It provided grant funding to partners across the state to market and administer the program. Some of the partners used incentives and program supports to promote healthy habits according to the schedule below. Program retention statistics are included in the Statistics on Enrollment and Retention subsection below.

Oregon
Health Share of Oregon, one of the Coordinated Care Organizations that participated in the Medicaid Coverage for the National DPP Demonstration Project, shared that one of its best practices relating to program supports includes making sure they are related to the material and that it promotes healthy living. It also suggested, as a consideration, to partner with other organizations to provide deals, prizes, or other incentives when there is no funding available.
To learn more about how the Medicaid Coverage for the National DPP Demonstration Project was implemented in Oregon and the plan for ongoing sustainability of the program, visit the Oregon Medicaid Demonstration Project page of the Coverage Toolkit.
Six National Organizations
In 2012, CDC funded six national organizations through a five-year cooperative agreement to scale and sustain multistate networks of CDC-recognized organizations to deliver the National DPP lifestyle change program. A study based on this effort found that most of the CDC-recognized organizations offered the following three types of program supports and incentives to retain participants in the National DPP lifestyle change program. The incentives were program-funded and were not supported by federal funding.
- Non-monetary Program Supports
- Program supports included gym memberships, pedometers, food-measuring devices, or cookbooks
- Used by 118 of the reporting CDC-recognized organizations (78.7%)
- Monetary Incentives
- Incentives included coupons or gift cards (less than $25 value)
- Used by 32 of the reporting CDC-recognized organizations (21.3%)
- Removal of Barriers of Access
- Program supports included childcare or transportation passes
- Used by 29 of the reporting CDC-recognized organizations (19.3%)
Only the non-monetary incentives were found to significantly impact attendance. When non-monetary incentives were used participants attended an average of 1.8 more sessions and participated in the program an average of 27.8 more days.
Another retention tool utilized by the CDC-recognized organizations was cultural adaptation (e.g., using cultural images, and incorporating cultural dietary restrictions and preferences). When cultural adaption was used participants attended an average of 1.4 more sessions and participated in the program an average of 29.5 more days.
Retention Statistics
The following examples illustrate state and partner experiences with retention numbers in their implementation of the National DPP lifestyle change program.
Denver Health
Denver Health, a Colorado-based safety net health system, attempted to recruit 4,495 individuals that it identified as being eligible for the National DPP Lifestyle Change program using medical record data. A total of 782 of these individuals, or 17.4%, attended at least one session. Further, approximately 1 in 10 at-risk individuals would enroll (i.e., verbally commit to participating in a session) when contacted by a Lifestyle Coach, whereas nearly 1 in 2 individuals would enroll if referred by their provider.
Of the 617 participants who completed the yearlong program, 238 (38.6%) attended nine or more sessions. Approximately 50% of the participants were Medicaid beneficiaries and 80% were low income.
Denver Health: Latinos
Denver Health conducted a study to determine how results differ between Latino and non-Hispanic white participants enrolled in the National DPP lifestyle change program. It found that Latinos were approximately half as likely to attend the sessions and were also less likely to achieve 5% weight loss when compared to the non-Hispanic white participants. Discovering and resolving barriers to participation among Latinos may be a key step in improving attendance and reducing their risk reduction outcomes. The study can be found here.
North Carolina: Minority Diabetes Prevention Program
Of the individuals who enrolled in North Carolina’s Minority Diabetes Prevention Program, 50% of participants completed at least 4 classes, 33% completed at least 8 classes, and 25% completed at least 9 classes.
A 2023 Report by the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services on the Minority Diabetes Prevention Program is available here.
YMCA
The YMCA of the USA implemented the National DPP lifestyle change program with Medicare beneficiaries, through support from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation’s Health Care Innovation Awards. The YMCA of the USA DPP 2015 Annual Report found at the end of the eleventh quarter (March 2015), that of the 6,874 Medicare beneficiaries who attended at least one session, 82.9% attended four or more sessions (see table below). For additional data reports from this project, see CMS’ Health Care Innovation Awards page.
| Number of Sessions | Number of Participants | Percentage of Total Recruited Participants* (n=6,874) |
|---|---|---|
| 1–3 sessions | 1,178 | 17.2% |
| 4–8 sessions | 1,370 | 19.9% |
| 9–16 sessions | 2,578 | 37.5% |
| 17+ sessions | 1,748 | 25.4% |
| Total | 6,874 | 100% |
| * Recruited participants include those who have attended at least one session. | ||
Table included in the CMMI Y-DPP model test evaluation report; reformatted for this site.


